Centro Andaluz de Biología Molecular y Medicina Regenerativa
Pedro Ortega

Pedro Ortega

Cellular Stress Signaling and PAR biology

e-mail: pedro.ortega@cabimer.es

Google Scholar: Pedro Ortega
ORCID: 0000-0003-4216-3695
SCOPUS: 57211903935
X: @pedroorteg
Bluesky: @pedroorteg.bsky.social

Overview:

Cells are continuously exposed to endogenous and environmental stressors, including DNA damage, oxidative stress, and viral infection. To cope with these challenges, they activate stress signaling pathways that determine whether cells restore homeostasis and survive or progress toward cell death. A central question is how stress signaling pathways coordinate the cellular responses that drive survival or cell death, a challenge with implications for human disease, such as cancer, and the development of novel therapeutic strategies.

Current research lines:

1- PAR Signaling in Cellular Stress Responses

Poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR) biology represents a fundamental stress signaling network that enables cells to rapidly respond to DNA damage, oxidative stress, viral infection, and other cellular perturbations. PARP enzymes orchestrate these responses by synthesizing PAR polymers that regulate protein interactions, chromatin organization, nucleic acid metabolism, and biomolecular condensates. Through DNA damage studies, our work has contributed to understanding how PAR signaling safeguards genome stability and how its dysregulation creates therapeutic vulnerabilities in cancer. However, PAR signaling extends far beyond DNA repair, and we have found that it regulates RNA metabolism and translation. These observations highlight a broader spectrum of PAR-dependent cellular responses beyond genome maintenance and raise fundamental questions about the full range of causes and consequences driven by PAR signaling. My research seeks to understand how PAR signaling is regulated across diverse stress conditions to control cellular adaptation and cell fate, uncovering therapeutically targetable vulnerabilities.

2- Translational Control in Cellular Stress Responses

Translational control represents a key downstream output of stress signaling pathways, including protein misfolding, oxidative stress, and viral infection. These pathways converge on the rapid reprogramming of protein synthesis, yet the mechanisms connecting stress sensing to translational control are not yet fully understood. Our studies have contributed to the identification of factors that modulate translation during viral infection, DNA damage, and endogenous double-stranded RNA signaling. These findings suggest that translational control constitutes a fundamental component of cellular stress signaling and have motivated my current research into how stress signaling pathways remodel protein synthesis and how this can be therapeutically exploited.

I have selected 10 publications from my full record, which can be a found at ORCID: 0000-0003-4216-3695.

  1. Ortega, P., Bournique, E., Li, J., et al., & Buisson, R. (2025). Mechanism of DNA replication fork breakage and PARP1 hyperactivation during replication catastrophe. Science Advances. 11(16), eadu0437. (1/10). DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adu0437.
  2. Manjunath, L., Santiago, G., Ortega, P., et al., & Buisson, R. (2025). Cooperative Role of PACT and ADAR1 in preventing aberrant PKR activation by self-derived dsRNA. Nature Communications. 16, 3246. (3/10). DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-58412-2.
  3. Manjunath, L.*, Oh, S.*, Ortega, P., et al., & Buisson, R. (2023). APOBEC3B drives PKR-mediated translation shutdown and protects stress granules in response to viral infection. Nature Communications. 14, 820. (2/13). DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-36445-9.
  4. Bournique, E., Sanchez, A., Ha, K., Yan, K.M., Manjunath, L., Santiago, G., Ortega, P., & Buisson, R. (2026). PARP1 trapping activates ATM-mediated NF-kB signaling independent of replication in response to TOP1 blockade. Nucleic Acids Research. 54(10), gkag561. (8/9). DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkag561.
  5. Ortega, P., Sanchez, A., Seldin, M., & Buisson, R. (2025). Oligo-seq: An in vitro sequencing-based protocol to identify DNA motifs targeted by base editors. STAR Protocols. 6(2), 103758. (1/3). DOI: 10.1016/j.xpro.2025.103758.
  6. Sanchez, A., Ortega, P., Sakhtemani, R., et al., & Buisson, R. (2024). Mesoscale DNA features impact APOBEC3A and APOBEC3B deaminase activity and shape tumor mutational landscapes. Nature Communications. 15, 2370. (2/14). DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-45909-5.
  7. Neubert, E.N., DeRogatis, J.M., Lewis, S.A., Viramontes, K.M., Ortega, P., Henriquez, M.L., Buisson, R., Messaoudi, I., & Tinoco, R. (2023). HMGB2 regulates the differentiation and stemness of exhausted CD8+ T cells during chronic viral infection and cancer. Nature Communications. 14, 5631. (5/9). DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-41352-0.
  8. Ortega, P., Mérida-Cerro, J.A., Rondón, A.G., Gómez-González, B., & Aguilera, A. (2021). DNA-RNA hybrids at DSBs interfere with repair by homologous recombination. eLife. 10, 1–22. (1/5). DOI: 10.7554/eLife.69881.
  9. Ortega, P., García-Pichardo, D., San Martin-Alonso, M., Rondón, A.G., Gómez-González, B. (AC), & Aguilera, A. (2020). Histone H3E73Q and H4E53A mutations cause recombinogenic DNA damage. Microbial Cell. 7, 190–198. (1/5). DOI: 10.15698/mic2020.07.723.
  10. Ortega, P., Gómez-González, B., & Aguilera, A. (2019). Rpd3L and Hda1 histone deacetylases facilitate repair of broken forks by promoting sister chromatid cohesion. Nature Communications. 10, 5178. (1/3). DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-13210-5.